Tuesday, May 02, 2006

TIM LAMBERT GETS IT WRONG AGAIN

Scrambling to compose his alarmingly fluid position on DDT, Lambert recently cited this study of anti-malaria efforts in Eritrea between 2000 and 2004. Lambert's post mentions DDT use in Eritrea as do his comments. The study's Table 3 shows that DDT was used for indoor residual spraying throughout the period, peaking in 2003 at 17,423 kg.

This is directly contradicted by an earlier Lambert post (to get around Lambert's link bouncing, copy and paste http://timlambert.org/2005/06/ddt9-2/) . The post is based on an article at Eritrea Daily. Its title is "Eritrea cuts malaria rates by switching away from DDT". According to Lambert:
The World Bank is the largest funder of Eritrea’s anti-malaria program. The Eritrea Daily reports on the good results... And what did they do to get such dramatic reductions? Why they significantly increased the use of insecticide treated nets... And stopped using DDT...
Lambert's claim is wrong; Eritrea actually increased its DDT use. Further, the article on which he bases his claim that Eritrea stopped using DDT does not even mention DDT – he just made this up. He should, as he so often demands of others who have allegedly erred, correct this obvious misrepresentation. (Other Lambert misrepresentations are described here, here and here.)

Update: Rather than engage me on the misrepresentation issue Lambert again accuses me of attention seeking (go here and click on comments). He certainly has the personal-attack-as-rebuttal move down pat. Oh well, there's a good chance Lambert's social ineptitude and fascination with numbers are probably beyond his control:
Asperger’s is the least disabling form of autism and research is beginning to show that it may also account for the presence of some special capabilities in areas like mathematics, computer science and engineering. But the same genes may also create a person who is socially awkward, easily distracted, very introspective and in many ways withdrawn and solitary.

3 Comments:

Blogger GMO Pundit said...

I can't get through the login procedure to comment at Tim Lamberts places.
Pity.
I'd like to ask them to desist prattling on about "blood libels" and focus on whether difficulties in using DDT have caused problems, as suggested explicitly in sections of the Malaria Journal article Lambert avoids mentioning.

The reasons why there is a resurgence of interest in IRS with DDT is that the problems Lambert is in denial about (described by Roberts, Attaran and referred to in Malaria Journal) made it clear that the bans on DDT of the 1990s were a big error.

Careful attentive reading of the medical literature makes this obvious.

Lambert has that literature, but attentive sensitive reading of it is yet to be done by him.

He has made it clear that he will not easily pay attention to the downsides of blocking DDT use, or the awkward facts of history-epidemics in Africa and S. America. Forget him till he starts waking up to the mess he's in and think only about informing his audience.

10:20 AM  
Blogger Ed Darrell said...

Do you have a source for your claim that Sri Lanka increased DDT use massively after the tsunami? I don't see one cited.

Did I just miss it?

6:41 PM  
Blogger J F Beck said...

Where did I mention Sri Lanka?

6:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home