All grown up
The stylish dyed hair is gone, a new wife-tickler creating a look of manly sophistication. Keep the fuzz, I say.
posted by Anonymous at 9:28 AM |
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Previous Posts
- Lunartic
- Silly female motorcyclist
- I preferred Jen Hawkin's Wardrobe Malfunction
- Just don't Call him an Antisemite. He's an "Anti-Z...
- Tough Words
- Bob vs Gore
- Gavin Moves On
- Ex-Trad-Ition
- On Balance
- Fireworks Fizzer
- Contact JF: RWDB-at-budweiser.com
- Click here to contact Dan
- Gavin Atkins (Shadowlands)
- Andrew Bolt
- Blazing Cat Fur
- Boy on a bike
- Cablog (Man of Lettuce)
- Catallaxy
- Clarity And Resolve
- Club Troppo
- Country Store
- Currency Lad
- Decision '08
- Freeborn John (Peter Risdon)
- FX Holden
- GMO Pundit (David Tribe)
- Instapundit
- James Waterton
- Just One Minute
- Kae's Bloodnut Blog
- Kalimna (Harry Clarke)
- Kev Gillett
- Legal Eagle
- Leigh Cartwright (House Of Wheels)
- Letters From the Front
- Melanie Phillips
- Opinion Dominion
- Oz Conservative
- Pigs Are Flying
- Polemica
- Quadrant
- Quentin George
- Romeo Mike
- RWDBogan
- The Better Part of Valour
- Theo Spark
- The Observation Deck
- The Thin Man Returns
- Tim Blair
- Whacking Day
- White Sun Of The Desert (Tim Newman)
- Zoe Brain
Blogroll
Archives
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- November 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
19 Comments:
That's a little unimpressive. Something about testosterone levels? Sparse fuzz and a pinstripe? Mmmmm. Good 'Blue Steel' look happening though.
Is that a hip Mr Bean?
I agree Beck.
When Sear or Loewenstein update their underwear collections, I'll know where to come for analysis and thoughtful opinion.
Hmmm. Eating every day? Maybe all day from the looks.
Oh I see, it's also a prompt for little Becky's even littler satellites to emerge and insult Sear's wife.
Personal obsessions, nitpicking and fat jokes. No wonder they booted you from Asian Correspondent and sent you back to the corner of the Internet.
Not the wife Mr Sensitive, nothing to do with her. The big J is losing his figure. You know like, the before and after shots? Such hard work
John,
I know it's a bit of a tired argument to say "if you don't like it, leave", "change the channel", "buy another newspaper" etc.
But dude. Seriously.
At the very least, if you're going to hang around here complaining about the content and be the local whiny bitch, you could at least be mildly entertaining in your insults, no?
Not the wife Mr Sensitive, nothing to do with her. The big J is losing his figure. You know like, the before and after shots?
You obviously spend your time analysing Sear's before and after shots and keeping tabs on his figure. I prefer more worthwhile leisure pursuits, like not obsessing about people I've probably never met.
And the 'eating every day' phrase was a reference to his wife's blog, and ergo to her. Don't insult my intelligence by trying to claim otherwise.
I know it's a bit of a tired argument to say "if you don't like it, leave", "change the channel", "buy another newspaper" etc.
Actually, LD, I see my contributions here as something of a community service.
This blog, on the whole, is a vapid quagmire of wingnut jibes, obsessions and failed attempts at humour. I like to provide a contrasting voice to demonstrate just how feeble some of the posting here actually is. (Which is not to suggest that it is all dross; there have been some posts here that I have enjoyed.)
"You obviously spend your time analysing Sear's before and after shots and keeping tabs on his figure"
Yeah my analysis consisted of two clicks, 20 seconds and 20/20 eyesight.
Pretty obsessive. Hours of study.
The inference, spanner, was that he's indulging too much in her cooking. My God I just realised how horrible that is to say. Or then again not. He should just go for a run.
You really are a hypersensitive tool that makes assumptions 'without evidence'. Can't help yourself from being a knob I guess. Part of the fragile ego.
"I see my contributions here as something of a community service"
Contributions of.......dross.
Interestingly certain other blogs immediately censor similar 'contributions' if they upset particularly sensitive/hypocritical people operating them.
Hmm what are they afraid of?
The Flatus doth protest too much.
I don't give any attention to the changing body weight of far-away bloggers; it is not relevant to their ideas or my life. Why on Earth you think it is worth commenting on is a mystery. Unless, of course, you were an embittered, venomous, anonymous troll...
Interestingly certain other blogs immediately censor similar 'contributions' if they upset particularly sensitive/hypocritical people operating them.
Yes, and it is to the credit of this blog that no such censorship occurs. Otherwise dissenters (like me) and dysfunctionals (like you) would probably be quickly silenced.
"embittered, venomous, anonymous troll..."
I think that's called projection. Excellent text book example Johnno. Nice job.
If you don't find a prat doing a serious 'Blue Steel' for the camera funny, there's no hope for you.
Suggest you follow your own advice re the last point, in your 'hypothetical' blog.
PS a village idiot is not dissenting. He's a village idiot.
If you don't find a prat doing a serious 'Blue Steel' for the camera funny, there's no hope for you.
And when you get your kicks out of mocking people's photographs, then there's definitely none for you.
Of course you could post your own photographs to demonstrate that you are more handsome and camera-friendly than the guy you are mocking. But we both know that'll never happen, don't we? So the invisible will keep chanting 'Man, is just so fat/ugly/gormless'.
PS a village idiot is not dissenting. He's a village idiot.
Continuing with the same low standard of debate you established a while ago, I see.
"Of course you could post your own photographs to demonstrate that you are more handsome and camera-friendly than the guy you are mocking"
Whether I'm handsome or otherwise is irrelevant. I don't upload pictures of myself seriously doing a 'Blue Steel' on the internet, and then expect people not to take the piss. That is mockworthy.
But some are sensitive luveys, not sure why. After all you would'nt do it would you?
I do also concede 'John' you are a better mass debater than myself.
So, John automatically assumes that any jibe about a person's weight is actually directed to his wife.
If I was the subject's wife, say, and was reading John's comments, I would be angry with him. Of course, John has "probably never met" the subject or his wife, so John should be fine. Proba ly
"Continuing with the same low standard of debate you established a while ago, I see."
Says the man who just called someone 'The Flatus'.
"And the 'eating every day' phrase was a reference to his wife's blog, and ergo to her. Don't insult my intelligence by trying to claim otherwise."
Do you actually think that what you wrote made sense?
John automatically assumes that any jibe about a person's weight is actually directed to his wife.
When it references the name of her blog, then yes, of course it is directed to his wife, or at least about her. It insults the intelligence to suggest otherwise.
Says the man who just called someone 'The Flatus'.
The person concerned initiated that by calling himself 'john's flatus' in one of the several nicks he has used. And since he self-identified as such, who am I to deny his wishes?
Do you actually think that what you wrote made sense?
Yes, at least to those who can read. Which I acknowledge probably excludes a few here.
Post a Comment
<< Home