Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Unscientific

Hans von Storch and Nico Stehr, writing in Spiegel Online, question the tactics of the Global Warming doom-mongers. As the following edited excerpt shows, many within the scientific community want to scare us into believing:

The assumption is made that fear compels people to act ... to ensure that the entire system continues to function in the long term, each new claim about the future of our climate and of the planet must be just a little more dramatic than the last.

All of this leads to a spiral of exaggeration. Each individual step in this process may seem harmless, but on the whole, the knowledge imparted to the public about climate, climatic fluctuations, climate shift and climatic effects is dramatically distorted.

Unfortunately, the corrective mechanisms in science are failing. Public reservations with regard to the standard evidence of climate catastrophe are often viewed as unfortunate within the scientific community, since they harm the "worthy cause," especially because, as scientists claim, they could be "misused by skeptics." Dramatization on a small scale is considered acceptable, whereas correcting exaggeration is viewed as dangerous because it is politically inopportune. This means that doubts are not voiced publicly. Instead, the scientific community creates the impression that the scientific underpinnings of climate change research are solid and only require minor additions and adjustments.

Other scientists are succumbing to a form of fanaticism almost reminiscent of the McCarthy era. In their minds, criticism of methodology is nothing but the monstrous product of "conservative think-tanks and misinformation campaigns by the oil and coal lobby," which they believe is their duty to expose. In contrast, dramatization of climate shift is defended as being useful from the standpoint of educating the public.


If anyone from the evil oil and gas lobby happens to read this – a long-shot considering the size of my readership – I'm a bit short of funds at the moment and, being a conservative, have no scruples. Hint, hint.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home