UNFAIR COMPARISON
Do the two above have the same likelihood of pulling off this cunning stunt? Tell a television news crew in amusing accents that I had witnessed the assault, that a fat wog and a skinny wog were arguing, and that one had shot the other one, like, chk, chk, BOOM.The well-spoken bogan babe wins.
Get an enthusiastic News Ltd. blogger to unquestioningly mythologise my performance
…
Profit!!1!
Update: Ultra-creative John Surname -- think PP boy but without the multiple retractions and apologies, yet -- has taken to calling me B. O Dreck. Whoa.
Update II: Two of my last 100 referrals are from John Surname's Random Brainwave. Wow, maybe I should go for some adverts and make some real money.
posted by Anonymous at 6:40 PM |
3 Comments:
First they said the media interest in Ms Werbeloff was simply because she's hot - that she's nothing more than a pretty face, and that her recent brush with fame is because conservatives are really nothing more than horny schoolboys deep down.
Then they argued it was because of the innate racism that everybody knows lurks deep within the dark conservative soul - and they proved it by writing a series of rather embarrassing racist comments themselves.
Now Ms Werbeloff's success is because of poor News Ltd journalistic standards?
Apart from the fact that the narrative keeps evolving every ten minutes or so, what about Crikey's own rather gushing piece on Ms Werbeloff, which came out more-or-less at the same time as Tim Blair's? Tim's original two-sentence post can't hold a candle to it.
But I guess Tim just isn't much of an "unquestioning mythologiser." Pity. There might have been a lucrative job for him as a taxpayer-funded historian...
Anon 10:47 ... great call.
The real laugh is that John Surname is no prize winner in the looks department either.
Post a Comment
<< Home