Thursday, November 11, 2010

Wally willy worry

(Walter) Jeremy Sear is worried that "poorly educated, semi-fluent morons" employed by the Transport Security Administration might touch his penis in the course of a security search should he travel by air to the United States:
What other country offers travelers such an intimate “service” for free the minute they get off the plane? What other country is so excitingly dominant that it doesn’t care whether we consent or not? What other country shows everyone, regardless of gender, age, in such a physical way that it’s not just what’s on their outside that counts?
Sear, an attention-to-detail barrister, ignores that U.S. body searches are required only of those who decline body scans, which is also the case at Holland's Schiphol airport:
Is use of the security scan mandatory?

No, passengers are allowed to refuse to go through the security scan. In such cases, passengers are searched in full.
If Sear's brain is any indication of penis size, his willy worry is understandable.

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

How long have you waited with bated breath to be able to write about his penis?

Suddenly the obsession makes so much sense.

7:10 PM  
Anonymous Dan Lewis said...

American aviation security is a joke. As amusing as this story is, I daresay Sear isn't a genuine threat and their obsessive refusal to profile passengers, means guys like him, and eighty year old Jewish women, are getting frisked, whereas 20 year old Muslim males - the overwhelmingly likely host group for hijackers, are given a free pass to avoid upsetting anyone.

Sydney is a bigger joke, where airport security is run by Muslims. As I expect, is the baggage handling

Yes, yes, not all Muslims are terrorists. We know. However like it or not, an airport is simply not secure as long as people (at best) one step removed from Islamism, are allowed access to sensitive areas.

8:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/qld-man-charged-over-40cm-penis-tattoo-20101026-171fd.html

8:06 AM  
Anonymous Chistery said...

Dan,

One the upside, Sydney is the one place where my most carefully packed breakables marked fragile get smashed to bits and luggage is returned with wheels busted off. I am reasonably confident those clowns will be an effective bomb (plus themselves) disposal unit.

8:43 AM  
Anonymous Chistery said...

While we're on this subject...

12:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beck

Tim Lambert USW Professor of Delusion Science chair is at it again plugging for St. Rachael Carson.

If Anthony Low gets your attention so does this idiotic loser.

2:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

PP now have a podcast.
You can hear smear jeer and Dave wax lyrical. If only they did talkback.
On an interesting note.
It appears that the left have no issue with assylum seekers apealing and apealing till the cows come home because they deserve justice, but if big tobacco excercise the same rights they are outraged.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/12/3065182.htm?site=melbourne

7:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A post about Jeremy Sear's penis. Vintage Beck. Why don't you draw us a picture of what you think it looks like.

9:43 AM  
Blogger Minicapt said...

Just for Anonymouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Y73sPHKxw

Cheers

3:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd hate to see moo cow Keri's scan. Is she going with him if he goes? Someone should warn the TSA.

7:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"(Walter) Jeremy Sear is worried that "poorly educated, semi-fluent morons" employed by the Transport Security Administration might touch his penis in the course of a security search should he travel by air to the United States"


Does he have a penis?

9:29 AM  
Anonymous Dan Lewis said...

Bestselling Author Antony Loewenstein complained that Israeli airport security touched his penis.

I'm pretty sure the security officer complained about it too.

7:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's another of Wally's thought bubbles;

....... if a lefty calls for change to the status quo but continues to operate within the status quo in the interim, that that is somehow “hypocritical”.

8:44 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home