Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Blogging lawyer exceeds brief

Crikey's Pure Poison's raison d'ĂȘtre is exposing "intellectual dishonesty" in the media yet today Jeremy Sear injects the Australian blog into American politics, referring to the rejection of a bill as "political bastardry". In fact, Time magazine and a dissenting Republican have explained the issues with the bill.

Lawyer Jeremy should adhere to his brief by staying out of U.S. politics, a topic about which he knows very little.

Labels: , ,

7 Comments:

Anonymous Chistery said...

Today Jeremy disagrees with Terry McCrann. So he falsely asserts that McCrann is calling all readers stupid if they disagree with him.

Yesterday, Jeremy agrees that a bill should have been passed by US congress. He acuses those that disagree with him of political bastardry.

Jeremy basically calls people names if they disagree with him. However he lays the name calling blame on the target of his post so he can sound self-righteous and take the moral high ground.

His punkah wallahs in comments fail to detect the irony.

9:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That silly little privileged twat loves to mewl about all sorts of stuff he doesn't know anything about, doesn't he?

12:15 PM  
Anonymous spot said...

"chitter chitter chitter" .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnJUWwSx1kE

(apols. minicapt)

12:12 PM  
Anonymous kelly said...

It is a very nice thing to see your excellent work and I like your article very much. With your rich knowledge, we can learn more from your wonderful post. Thanks so much.

8:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hahahahaha. A post mentions "Jeremy Sear" and an ambulance-chaser from California hones in and spams it. Hahahahahaha!

9:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many things happen when one says Jeremy Sear and none of them are good.

Say Keri James at the same time and you will feel a strange compulsion to make broth from spoiled meat and serve it to people.

12:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have you noticed that Jeremy Sear appears now to be arguing that insest is good for society? Or at least that it isn't as bad as 40 year old women having babies with men who aren't their brothers.

Told you so.

9:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home